YURISDIKSIYANI BELGILASHNING NAZARIY MUAMMOLARI: HUQUQIY DOKTRINALAR VA YONDASHUVLAR

Authors

  • Oybekova Shohida Shomurod qizi Toshkent dаvlаt yuridik universiteti mаgistri

Abstract

Ushbu dissertatsiya tadqiqotida yurisdiksiyani belgilashning nazariy muammolari, huquqiy doktrinalar va yondashuvlar tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot yurisdiksiyaning asosiy tushunchalari, uning huquqiy tabiati va turi, shuningdek, yurisdiksiyani belgilash mezonlariga bag‘ishlangan. Unda yurisdiksiya qoidalarini qo‘llash bilan bog‘liq muammolar va ziddiyatlar ko'rib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, turli xil huquqiy tizimlar va doktrinalar taqqoslanadi, yurisdiksiyani belgilash bo‘yicha yondashuvlar tahlil qilinadi. Natijada, yurisdiksiyani belgilash masalalarida qonunchilikni takomillashtirish bo'yicha amaliy takliflar ishlab chiqiladi.

Kalit so‘zlar: nazariy muammolar, huquqiy doktrinalar, huquqiy tizim, qonunchilikni takomillashtirish

References

1. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997), va boshqalar. Yuridik nashrlar va maqolalar, masalan:https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/publications/blt/2015/09/09_cohen/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/internet_jurisdiction.

2. “Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and China” by Faye Fangfei Wang "Cyberlaw: The Law of the Internet and Information Technology" by Brian Craig.

3. Masofaviy Savdo Qonuni (Fernabsatzgesetz - FernAbsG): https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/fernabsg/

4. Iste'molchilarni Himoya Qilish Qonuni (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb - UWG): https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/uwg_2004/

5. Germaniya sud qarorlari, masalan: https://www.jurion.de/urteile/bgh/2004-03-08/iii-zr-32_03/

6. Chris Reed, "Making Laws for Cyberspace", Oxford University Press, 2012.

7. “The application of traditional jurisdictional rules to online activities can produce results that are difficult to justify in terms of principle or policy.” (p. 23)

8. "What is needed is a more nuanced approach that recognizes the unique characteristics of online activities and develops jurisdictional rules specifically tailored to the Internet." (p. 45)

9. Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, "Solving the Internet Jurisdiction Puzzle", Oxford University Press, 2017.

10. "The 'targeting' approach to jurisdiction, which focuses on the intention of the online actor to target a particular state, has gained significant support in recent years." (p. 67)

Downloads

Published

2024-06-15