THE NEW METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING TEXTILE TERMINOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Abstract
The teaching of textile terminology in higher education institutions is a critical aspect of specialized education within the field of textile science and technology. Given the complexity and specificity of textile terminology, educators must employ various pedagogical methods to ensure that students not only acquire an extensive vocabulary but also understand its practical application. This article explores the key methods used to teach textile terminology, examining their effectiveness and providing recommendations for improving the learning process.
References
1. Djanibekov, U., van Assche, K., Boezeman, D. and Djanibekov, N. (2013). Understanding contracts in evolving agro-economies: Fermers, dekhqans and networks in Khoresm, Uzbekistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 137-147.
2. Dries, L. and Swinnen, J. (2004). Foreign direct investment, vertical integration, and local suppliers: evidence from the Polish dairy sector. World Development, 32(9), 1525–1544.
3. Glover, D. and Kusterer, K. (1990). Small Farmers, Big Business: Contract Farming and Rural
Development. London: Macmillan.
4. Gow, H. and Swinnen, J. (2001). Private enforcement capital and contract enforcement in
transition countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 686–690.
5.Key, N. and Runsten, D. (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development, 27(2), 381–401.
6. Lerman, Z. (2010). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Evidence from Central Asia. Imre Ferto, Csaba Forgacs, Attila Jambor (Eds.): Changing landscape of European agriculture. Essays in honour of professor Csaba Csaki. Budapest: Agroinform, pp. 95–113.
