THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FUNCTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract
The article analyzes several function of the decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Firstly, the article briefly discusses the unification of judicial practice. It studies how the unification of judicial practice is important for the judicial system. Then it analyzes the theories related to unification of judicial practice.
The purpose of this research is to generalize the theories about plenum decisions and to develop a new theory based on the conclusion obtained as a result. As a result, final purpose of the article is to determine the possible influence of this institution on the independence of the courts.
Keywords: Plenum, Supreme Court, uniformity of judicial practice, court practice, interpretation, application of law.
References
Sinisa Rodin. “Discourse, Authority in European and Post-Communist Legal Culture” (2005) 1Croation Yearbook of European Law and Policy1, 6.
Gsovski. V. Soviet Civil Law. Vol.1. Michigan Legal Studies. Ann Arbor, 1948. P.258.
Т.Г. Морщакова. Верховенство права и проблемы его обеспечения в правоприменительной практике /Международная коллективная монография. М.: Статут, 2009, С.83
А.Н. Верещагин. Судебное правотворчество в России. Сравнительно-правовые аспекты. М.: Междунар. Отношения, 2004, С.154-158.
Р.Бевзенко./Ирина Вячеславовна Заховаева.Единообразие практики по гражданским делам: невозможное возможно.Экономика и жизнь.№35,2015, //https://www.eg-online.ru/print/article/291122/
Zdenek Kuhn. The Authoritarian legal culture at work: the passivity of parties and the interpretational statements of Supreme Courts. Croation Yearbook of European Law and Policy 2 (2006), 21.
