A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: A THEORETICAL EXPLORATION BY

Authors

  • Mokhlaroyim Turdalieva Maxammadismoil qizi STUDENT OF UZBEK STATE WORLD LANGUAGES UNIVERSITY

Abstract

This theoretical study provides an in-depth analysis of the methodological underpinnings of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PrBL) within the domain of English Language Teaching (ELT). Utilizing existing theoretical frameworks and pedagogical principles, the research synthesizes the distinctive instructional paradigms, cognitive processes, and educational implications associated with PBL and PrBL methodologies. Through a comprehensive review of literature, this study elucidates the theoretical foundations, delineating nuanced differences and convergences between PBL and PrBL. The findings contribute a theoretical scaffold for educators and researchers, offering insights into the methodologies intrinsic to PBL and PrBL and their application in fostering language acquisition and proficiency in ELT contexts.

Key words: English Language Teaching (ELT), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Project-Based Learning (PrBL), comparative study, theoretical framework.

References

1. Barab, S., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen, & S. Land (Eds). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

2. Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, R.M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.

3. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A.(1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3&4), 369-398.

4. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

5. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

6. Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 215–239). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

7. Lave. J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York and Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

8. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York: Grossman.

9. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson, (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Published

2025-02-09